tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2918475087448292262.post7958931516772989883..comments2024-03-23T18:57:41.646+01:00Comments on Flyktlinjer: Deleuze, en introduktion 2Eddyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15604918466067481109noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2918475087448292262.post-66616155327993609252018-03-24T14:04:38.767+01:002018-03-24T14:04:38.767+01:00Hur är det egentligen med rena,praktiska och ilusi...Hur är det egentligen med rena,praktiska och ilusionistiska förnuftet i våra dagar?<br />Det är värt en egen undersökning men förstånd (intellectus) är instrumentell synetisk organ som tolkar det som förnuft(ratio,novus)har analyserat med alla de konsekvenser för gemenskapen och uprättande av en sort imperativ eller etik.<br />Under tiden läser simultant och försöker hitta en röd tråd i alla dessa tanke gångar som kan leda fram till en konsensus men djup skeptisk.<br /><br />här är Zarko Paic tolkning av framvägen men vi för se :<br /><br />Abstract:<br /><br />The paper try to explore a problem of the relationship between philosophy and theology versus the triumph of modern technoscience in the creation of artificial intelligence and artificial life Author shows how so-called world views in dispute between “mind” and “faith” are confronted with the question of human existence in the form of cybernetic system of chaos and control and make the wrong opinions out of an genuine modernity. In an extensive analysis of Heidegger’s and Deleuze’s tkinking as paradigmatic philosophers concerning the question of the fate of metaphysics today, it has been emphasized that the difference between the end of metaphysics in cybernetics and ontology of the differences in the openness of the upcoming event means one step further to other possibilities of other history. Against the power of technoscientific logic of transformation the world in computing, planning and construction, philosophy and theology beyond traditional metaphysics has to search a new way to their unexamined sources. Technical time enslave authentic human existence and destroy the sacred place for an upcoming event. Instead obsolete approach in fighting of worldviews (theism vs.ateism) as ideological struggle for discursive power of ruling today, it is necessary to create the conditions for convergence in the encounter between “mind” and “faith “ beyond the reduction of philosophy and theology as the “positive” sciences of the modern age. Upcoming event transcends the vulgar actuality of time as well as future in the technical construction. It is a fundamental question about the meaning of life today in the time that remains in total technicisation of metaphysical fold Beign-God -World-Human.<br /><br />mvh /predrag Alan Fordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18145656617531585004noreply@blogger.com